|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 14 post(s) |

Pattern Clarc
Aperture Harmonics
123
|
Posted - 2011.10.10 18:27:00 -
[1] - Quote
BAD: No remote tracking link / titan tracking nerf - (Make Ewar immunity = no RTL's or any other form of electronic remote assistance) BAD: No shield/armor EHP balancing - (deadspace invuls) BAD: No real solution to supercarrier/titan roles - (they just seem to be cap killers?) BAD: Weird dread changes, Moros capacitor is ****** now, Naglfar pointless again - (Moros should tank better than it will, Naglfar should come close to out ganking the moros (due to split weapons). Ex CSM member & Designer of the Tornado. Gallente - Pilot satisfaction |

Pattern Clarc
Aperture Harmonics
123
|
Posted - 2011.10.10 18:37:00 -
[2] - Quote
I'll rephrase, what specifically are the roles of each class of capital ship combat wise? It kinda feels like this is a very reactionary (although necessary change) that lacks the *vision* needed to be understood by us. Ex CSM member & Designer of the Tornado. Gallente - Pilot satisfaction |

Pattern Clarc
Aperture Harmonics
123
|
Posted - 2011.10.10 18:59:00 -
[3] - Quote
Also, what do fighters do exactly? Ex CSM member & Designer of the Tornado. Gallente - Pilot satisfaction |

Pattern Clarc
Aperture Harmonics
129
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 11:38:00 -
[4] - Quote
CCP Tallest wrote:In this thread, I've read several very good reasons why the fighter change is a bad idea. You are right. Fighters should stay the way they are. The change would be unfair for carriers.
The poor performance of Minmatar capital ships is being looked at and was already being looked at before the blog was posted.
Pointing out flaws and issues with the balancing plan is very much appreciated. I will look into the issues and make changes where they are needed.
Once this hits SISI, I will start a thread in the test server feedback forums. Your concerns will be listened to and acted upon if necessary. 11/10
I still have a reservation, I think my fundamental question is, why would you fly a dread over a Titan, if cost wasn't an issue? It relates to roles, and the performance of these ships when roles are considered. If the answer is, you wouldn't fly a dread over a titan if they cost the same, do you think that's an issue or not? Ex CSM member & Designer of the Tornado. Gallente - Pilot satisfaction |

Pattern Clarc
Aperture Harmonics
371
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 12:53:00 -
[5] - Quote
Yeah, there really needs to be a definitive statement on what each class of capitals is for, atm, we're kinda lost. Ex CSM member & Designer of the Tornado. Gallente - Pilot satisfaction |

Pattern Clarc
Aperture Harmonics
371
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 16:48:00 -
[6] - Quote
Quote:Normally I don't say this, but damn, these tears are delicious.
You whiners realize that people flew moms even before they were buffed? People complained back then, but they still built them and put them into an alt, albeit motherships being useless crap.
Back then, there were two major reasons for supercap rebalance: 1. AOE doomsday was killing EVE 2. Titans were destroyed in under two minutes.
Both of these things did not relate to motherships at all. But CCP was nice and sort of introduced a new ship class, but completely overshot their goal and made motherships even matches for titans, despite them costing only a quarter of a titan.
The fact that EVE has 2-3k super pilots and even the poorest faggots fly them (I'd say 4 of 5 pilots could not easily replace their moms without alliance help) just shows how out of balance they are. It was obvious for over a year that they were due for a nerfbat, yet people still trained for them and are now crying that suddenly and totally surprising they're getting nerfed.
Tell you what. A mothership does not cost 20 bil, it costs 10 bil (k more like 12b after other costs). It is as strong as a ship with four times the material cost. It costs just 15 times more than a carrier, but does 8/10 times the DPS, has 20-30 times the tank. It costs 5 times more than a dread, but has 1.5 times the damage of a dread and 20-30 times the tank of one. Plus it has invulnerability to any forms of EW but neuts, it can defend against any ship there is in this game.
If you're crying about your shiny values being devalued, ask them for actually balancing that value and give moms 7 times the EHP of a carrier with 8k DPS to reflect their 15-fold price. Fitting 2 bil worth of rigs, 3b worth of low slots, a 2b implant set and paying 5b over build cost is your own damn problem. Mostly QFT from FHC, although the not docking **** is argued to be the justification for :derp: Ex CSM member & Designer of the Tornado. Gallente - Pilot satisfaction |
|
|
|